I’m going to try to provide further evidence about what Robert F Kennedy is saying here about regulatory capture, but anyone who’s put in more than a few minutes research knows the medical industry is hopelessly corrupt.
Here’s a section from one of the first peer reviewed scientific papers I looked at:
The new short-term carcinogenicity tests involved mice, which were genetically-manipulated by either introduction of genes associated with human cancer (known as oncogenes), or removal (‘knocking out’) of genes thought to suppress tumour development, known as tumour-suppressor genes (Tennant, 1996).
Scientists’ understanding of mechanistic routes of human carcinogenesis informed the types of genetic manipulation involved (2, see Interview Notes box).
The techno-scientific hypothesis underpinning the GEM tests was that tumour ‘initiation’ was built into genetically-engineered mice enabling carcinogenic effects to be detected much sooner than in ‘normal’ rodents because only later stages of carcinogenesis needed to occur during the experimental period of drug testing.
On this hypothesis, a carcinogenic drug should be detected quickly by GEM tests because ‘initiated’ animals should develop more cancer tumours more rapidly than ‘normal’ mice (Schou, 1992).
ICH outlined three main types of GEM tests: the tgAC model involving transgenic mice with the oncogene, v-Ha-ras, introduced; the rasH2 model using transgenic mice with the oncogene, cHa-ras; and the p53 model involving ‘knock-out’ mice with the tumour-suppressor gene, p53, removed.
For those who want to hear that in layman’s terms, they genetically engineered “humanized mice” to develop cancer faster by turning off tumor suppressing genes.
This then allowed them to say we can do the trial in months, not years, to work out if there’s a risk to cancer in humans, which it couldn’t really tell you even when they were normal mice, in a longer study.
Then you would assume that if the tumors did occur in rodents, they would not approve the product, but of course that’s not true.
As they admitted on the FDA site, the vaccines, pretty much all of them, cause tumors in rodents, and they said they’re working on trying to reduce that, by reducing the amount of time needed to observe the lab rats in trials by saying they made them more likely to get cancer.
Virus-based vaccines are made in living cells (cell substrates). Some manufacturers are investigating the use of new cell lines to make vaccines. The continual growth of cell lines ensures that there is a consistent supply of the same cells that can yield high quantities of the vaccine.
In some cases the cell lines that are used might be tumorigenic, that is, they form tumors when injected into rodents.
Some of these tumor-forming cell lines may contain cancer-causing viruses that are not actively reproducing. Such viruses are hard to detect using standard methods.
These latent, or “quiet,” viruses pose a potential threat, since they might become active under vaccine manufacturing conditions. Therefore, to ensure the safety of vaccines, our laboratory is investigating ways to activate latent viruses in cell lines and to detect the activated viruses, as well as other unknown viruses, using new technologies.
We will then adapt our findings to detect viruses in the same types of cell substrates that are used to produce vaccines. We are also trying to identify specific biological processes that reflect virus activity.
So what they’re saying is, they’re allowing vaccine manufacturers to make vast quantities of vaccines made out of aborted fetal cells turned into immortal cancerous cell lines, which do cause cancer in rodents and to then inject them into every single child as soon as they’re born.
They tried to reduce the amount of time used to do a trial on the lab rats, by saying they genetically modified the mice so that the cancer would show up faster, but they’re still getting tumors, more than they used to, with the new immortal cancer cell lines that the FDA is allowing these scum to inject into your children.
But, here’s the good part, they’re working on it. They only get most of their money from the big pharma companies to approve their products, and the FDA scientists get cushy jobs at Pfizer after they approve the products.
Products that cause more cancer than ever, along with various other chronic illnesses that they have the “cure” for but they say you can trust us, because we’re the FDA. Yeah right.
I’m going to say that I think that the human race would be better off if none of these medications existed at all, or it would definitely be better off if we chose for ourselves which ones, if any of them we want to take rather than have them shoved down our throats or alternatively kept from us.