
I’ve been going back and forth for a while about whether they attacked us with a biological weapon, or whether they attacked us with a fake biological weapon, which didn’t actually exist, and I still haven’t made up my mind.
I know they planned it, and I know they lied about almost every aspect of it, from start to finish.
Masks, tests, social distancing, vaccines, toxic medicines and deadly protocols like Remdesivir, Midazolam and morphine on a ventilator, which is enough to kill people by itself.

On my last video, I talked about how I think it’s a bit too much of a reach to say no viruses exist, because something has been making people sick for all of human history, and there is fairly good evidence that vaccines did do something to prevent some illnesses.
There may or may not be a larger amount of problems caused by some of the shots, it’s hard to tell, because we know how much they’ve been lying and covering up the side effects.
The thing is, covid is something entirely different than we’ve seen before, and we may discover there have been other virus frauds, but none that can compare to this one.

This is the mother of all medical frauds, due to the impact it had on the lives of virtually everyone in the world.
Dr Michael Yeadon just wrote an article on The Conservative Woman where he lays out the case for why he believes there is no covid virus, and it’s fairly convincing.
Here’s a bit of it:
Why I don’t believe there ever was a Covid virus

I’VE grown increasingly frustrated about the way debate is controlled around the topic of origins of the alleged novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, and I have come to disbelieve it’s ever been in circulation, causing massive scale illness and death.
Concerningly, almost no one will entertain this possibility, despite the fact that molecular biology is the easiest discipline in which to cheat.
That’s because you really cannot do it without computers, and sequencing requires complex algorithms and, importantly, assumptions. Tweaking algorithms and assumptions, you can hugely alter the conclusions.

This raises the question of why there is such an emphasis on the media storm around Fauci, Wuhan and a possible lab escape. After all, the ‘perpetrators’ have significant control over the media.
There’s no independent journalism at present. It is not as though they need to embarrass the establishment. I put it to readers that they’ve chosen to do so.
So who do I mean by ‘they’ and ‘the perpetrators? There are a number of candidates competing for this position, with their drug company accomplices, several of whom are named in Paula Jardine’s excellent five-part series for TCW, Anatomy of the sinister Covid project.

High on the list is the ‘enabling’ World Economic Forum and their many political acolytes including Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Ardern.
But that doesn’t answer the question, why are they focusing on the genesis of the virus. In my view, they are doing their darnedest to make sure you regard this event exactly as they want you to. Specifically, that there was a novel virus.
I’m not alone in believing that myself, at the beginning of the ‘pandemic’, but over time I’ve seen sufficient evidence to cast strong doubt on that idea. Additionally, when considered as part of a global coup d’état, I have put myself in the position of the most senior, hidden perpetrators.

In a Q&A, they would learn that the effect of a released novel pathogen couldn’t be predicted accurately. It might burn out rapidly. Or it might turn out to be quite a lot more lethal than they’d expected, demolishing advanced civilizations.
Those top decision-makers would, I submit, conclude that this natural risk is intolerable to them.
They crave total control, and the wide range of possible outcomes from a deliberate release militates against this plan of action:

‘No, we’re not going to do this. Come back with a plan with very much reduced uncertainty on outcomes.’
The alternative I think they’ve used is to add one more lie to the tall stack of lies which has surrounded this entire affair.
This lie is that there has ever been in circulation a novel respiratory virus which, crucially, caused massive-scale illness and deaths. In fact, there hasn’t.

A fairly certain statement by a former top level scientist at Pfizer, who explains that he has colleagues who know a lot about viruses, and say it’s impossible to engineer them in the lab in the way they claim to be doing.
A virus is a microscopic thing that can’t be seen by human eyes, and some even doubt the claim that you can see them with an electron microscope.
It’s a bit like looking at far distant stars and trying to work out if the planets orbiting them have life, when the most you could ever see is a single speck of light or shadow.

They claim to have mapped the human genome, and done computer sequencing on the DNA of viruses, but you really have to wonder if they’re lying through their teeth about how advanced their technology actually is.
People get sick, it’s fairly certain it’s a living microbe causing the illness, as opposed to a dead chemical, and maybe they can take the blood of a sick person and turn it into a vaccine against whatever they had.
That doesn’t mean it “works” if it causes a whole bunch of side effects that outweigh the benefits, and the long term risks seem to be presenting themselves, but are being ignored.
There’s an ever increasing amount of cancer, autism, auto-immune conditions, and so on, which might be due to toxic chemicals in the food supply, the water, or the air, but which also might be caused by the vaccines.
Dr Yeadon says if people take another five to ten of these new mrna shots, they will probably be dead, because they were probably designed to kill people, and I have to agree.
It’s not going to be obvious enough to the normies that they will stop taking them, but it’s already obvious enough to us conspiracy theorists that we can say I told you so.
With literally millions of excess deaths, the covid pandemic itself is starting to seem small in comparison, if covid ever even existed, at all.




































There are no viruses. Just watch some of Tom Cowan’s work or Sam Bailey. Virology is a joke, a complete fraud. If people actually understood what virologists call isolation of the virus they wouldn’t believe you.
LikeLike
I seen what they call isolation of a virus, and you’re right, it doesn’t look very scientific at all. That doesn’t however mean there is proof that viruses don’t exist. You have to explain why people get sick in an almost identical way to bacteria, but you can’t see the bacteria, and why they seem to have made vaccines by taking whatever it was they “isolated” and killing it and turning it into an injection. That seems to have worked in many cases, even if there were side effects. I don’t think the people you’re talking about are saying themselves that they proved there are no viruses, but it sounds like that’s what they’re saying. One step too far in my view. https://www.bitchute.com/video/sOfRb7iOXOal/
LikeLike