The entire attack was obvious from the start, but when there’s a declared global food insecurity crisis and they continue to push for shutting down farming for “climate change” or reducing their nitrogen emissions by up to 70% you know they’re trying to kill us all.
Check this out, it’s an archived version of an article published on the UN website called The Benefits Of World Hunger. An excerpt:
Much of the hunger literature talks about how it is important to assure that people are well fed so that they can be more productive. That is nonsense. No one works harder than hungry people. Yes, people who are well nourished have greater capacity for productive physical activity, but well-nourished people are far less willing to do that work.George Kent, professor of political science at the University Of Hawaii
It’s hard to work for food if there isn’t any, you ridiculous moron, plus if you try to force people into starvation level poverty to make them obedient slaves, they will kill you, it’s already happening, and I hope they do kill you personally just for writing that.
When the WEF said they were going to use food as a force for good, they meant to kill millions of people, which they are doing.
When the Rockerfeller Foundation said fundamental change is needed in their Resetting The Table document, to make people more healthy, they meant the opposite.
This is world war three, it’s not exactly officially declared because anyone in the position to be “official” is part of the problem and part of the enemy attacking humanity.
I mean you hear stories about Boris Johnson resigning, the Georgia Guidestones being demolished, Rand Paul grilling Fauci about his crimes, and it would seem like we’re making progress, but nobody ever goes to jail, and they keep pushing harder with all of it.
The surveys say 87% of people don’t trust the corporate media, and about the same with politicians and corporations, so it has reached tipping point, but unless they take violent action for real, it doesn’t actually mean anything.
I realize violent revolution got a bad name, (if it ever had a good one), from Antifa and BLM randomly attacking innocent civilians, but of course that’s not what I’m talking about.
You basically have to kill the people carrying out this attack on humanity, or possibly arrest them or threaten them if you’re in a position of power, but if you’re not the police, and the police are attacking you and enforcing these policies, you pretty much have to kill them too.
When I say that, I mean in situations where it is literally self defense because they’re trying to kill you, and that applies right now in many parts of the world because with Ukraine, Russia, Denmark and others not exporting food, millions will likely starve to death.
When you realize that this is a war and that’s how it’s being fought, it’s clear it meets the definition of a war crime, (among other things they’re doing), and that actually means it’s legal to kill them in self defense, if you need a legal justification.
There are various ways in which it’s totally clear it’s an attack like they’re causing a food shortage when they stop farmers from growing or damaging supply chains and there’s hundred of millions on the verge of starvation right now which could become billions quite easily.
They’re injecting people with poison that they know doesn’t work and is injuring people, and self defense doesn’t just apply to you, it applies to anyone you see them attacking with deadly force even if it presents as lying by omission.
It isn’t just the things they’re doing, it’s the way they’re doing them, seemingly laughing like genocidal maniacs, high on cocaine, unable to make sentences in some cases, or with a smug, elitist attitude that makes you want to rip their eyes out.
What else is happening? Russia took over the last stronghold in Eastern Ukraine, which was what anyone with a brain knew was going to happen, and it cost enough to end homelessness in the US, or it could have gone a long way towards feeding the whole world if they weren’t trying to do the opposite.
Just another trick to transfer trillions to the wealthiest people in the world? Yes, but many thousands died for no reason, and they could decide to make it a real war between superpowers if they really wanted to decimate the population.
When I say they, I kind of think Putin is one of them, and even if he wasn’t, the only reason anyone would start a nuclear conflict or anything approaching that is if the goal was to wipe out most of humanity.
That is basically the goal, and the main problem they have in doing that is people will notice it happening, and once everyone does, even “their own” armed forces will probably try to kill them, like what happened with Hitler but worldwide.